ASTS (ASTS)
ASTS remains NEUTRAL due to a lack of clear valuation support and insufficient floor-based guardrails.
- The stock trades at a high Price-to-Book of $16.02 (74.6% percentile) and a Price-to-Sales of $333.34, yet no current PE or PE percentile is available, leaving core valuation unanchored.
- The intrinsic floor analysis has no valid floors (dividend, valuation, or EPV) and low confidence, rendering the $72.96 price unsupported by the hard-logic floor model.
- Implied volatility is 100.04% with a neutral 1-year rank (50.7%), and the buyzone bucket is null — there are no actionable entry signals or strong risk alerts to tilt the verdict either way.
BUY-ZONE DECISION rule signal
Sign in
RULES & ALERTS FIRING
Sign in
VALUATION
Floor Engine
YOUR WATCHLIST CONTEXT
○ anonymous· Your personal floor / golden price overlay on the live price
· Per-ticker rule alerts when this stock crosses your thresholds
· Position P&L overlay — what this ticker means inside your full portfolio
IMPLIED VOLATILITY
Earnings Reactions
| Date | Time | EPS | Surprise | Gap% | Day% | Week% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | AMC | -0.66 | — | -11.02% | -11.62% | — |
| 2026-03-02 | AMC | -0.26 | -30.0% | +1.25% | +6.63% | +0.70% |
| 2025-11-10 | AMC | -0.45 | -58.4% | -1.21% | -1.18% | -15.25% |
| 2025-08-11 | AMC | -0.41 | -412.5% | +11.57% | +8.36% | -2.11% |
| 2025-05-12 | AMC | -0.20 | -0.0% | -4.66% | -2.25% | -7.84% |
| 2025-03-03 | AMC | -0.18 | -1.9% | -4.29% | +11.67% | +11.87% |
| 2024-11-14 | AMC | -1.10 | — | -13.51% | -9.59% | -10.07% |
| 2024-08-14 | AMC | -0.51 | -133.4% | +4.76% | +50.70% | +64.06% |
| 2024-05-15 | AMC | -0.16 | +24.0% | +31.38% | +68.62% | +73.22% |
Is ASTS (ASTS) overvalued right now?
Whether ASTS (ASTS) is overvalued depends on the lens you use: trailing P/E vs its own history, CAPE vs the broader market, earnings yield vs Treasury yields. We surface all three so you don't have to pick one in isolation.
ASTS (ASTS) — what's the SELL PUT risk profile?
Selling cash-secured puts on ASTS (ASTS) is a common income strategy, but the right strike depends on your floor price (the level you'd happily own at) and the option chain's buffer/APY tradeoff. The full ladder view (deferred to a future release) ranks candidates by buffer percentage first, then APY — see the option ladder methodology for why buffer matters more than yield in this strategy.
ASTS (ASTS) — which option strategy fits your view?
If you're bullish long-term but cautious near-term on ASTS (ASTS), SELL PUT into your floor zone collects premium while waiting for a better entry. If you already own it and are neutral-to-mildly-bullish, COVERED CALL caps upside but harvests time decay. The wrong strategy on the right ticker still loses money — match the trade to your view, not the other way around.
ASTS (ASTS) — is now a good entry?
Entry timing on ASTS (ASTS) is a function of your floor price (hard buy zone) and golden price (back-the-truck-up zone). Both are personal — set them in your watchlist and we'll alert you when the market hits either level.
FAQ
Why does ASTS show different P/E numbers on different sites?
Different data providers use different earnings windows (TTM vs forward, GAAP vs adjusted) and update at different cadences. We surface trailing P/E with a 5-year percentile rank to give context — a P/E of 30 is hot for one stock and cold for another.
Does this page show ASTS's implied volatility?
Not on this v0 page — the dedicated volatility tool covers IV with multi-source voting (IBKR + Polygon + yfinance). For pure IV lookup, use /tools/volatility. This page is for decision-stage queries that pull together valuation + portfolio context.
How is this different from Yahoo Finance or 雪球's ASTS page?
Those sites are great for raw data discovery — last price, news, headline P/E. This page is built for the second look: you've already seen a single-dimension signal somewhere else, now you need multi-dimensional decision context (your floor, the valuation percentile, your portfolio overlay) in one view, not five tabs.