FCEL (FCEL)
FCEL is rated NEUTRAL because it lacks any valuation data and conventional floor methods, while its extreme implied volatility suggests high uncertainty without a clear directional signal.
- Implied volatility is at 198.33%, ranking in the 99th percentile over the past year — indicating the market prices extreme risk but not a direction.
- No PE, PB, or PS data exist, and the floor analysis finds zero valid valuation floors with low confidence, making traditional fair-value assessment impossible.
- No buy-zone triggers, risk alerts, or hot events are present, so there is no positive catalyst or urgent warning to shift the neutral stance.
BUY-ZONE DECISION rule signal
Sign in
RULES & ALERTS FIRING
Sign in
VALUATION
Floor Engine
YOUR WATCHLIST CONTEXT
○ anonymous· Your personal floor / golden price overlay on the live price
· Per-ticker rule alerts when this stock crosses your thresholds
· Position P&L overlay — what this ticker means inside your full portfolio
IMPLIED VOLATILITY
Earnings Reactions
| Date | Time | EPS | Surprise | Gap% | Day% | Week% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-08 | BMO | -0.53 | -21.8% | +0.75% | -10.56% | +0.98% |
| 2026-03-09 | BMO | -0.52 | +23.1% | -8.95% | -2.89% | -9.08% |
| 2025-12-18 | BMO | -0.93 | +9.7% | +17.59% | +22.03% | +7.34% |
| 2025-09-09 | BMO | -1.02 | +37.5% | +0.71% | +22.75% | +60.90% |
| 2025-06-06 | BMO | -1.75 | -26.4% | +5.00% | +24.42% | +15.96% |
| 2025-03-11 | BMO | -1.44 | -6.2% | -5.21% | +3.63% | -12.01% |
| 2024-12-19 | BMO | -1.99 | -24.2% | -0.20% | -4.99% | +2.24% |
| 2024-09-05 | BMO | -1.94 | +14.3% | +2.44% | +2.44% | +9.76% |
Is FCEL (FCEL) overvalued right now?
Whether FCEL (FCEL) is overvalued depends on the lens you use: trailing P/E vs its own history, CAPE vs the broader market, earnings yield vs Treasury yields. We surface all three so you don't have to pick one in isolation.
FCEL (FCEL) — what's the SELL PUT risk profile?
Selling cash-secured puts on FCEL (FCEL) is a common income strategy, but the right strike depends on your floor price (the level you'd happily own at) and the option chain's buffer/APY tradeoff. The full ladder view (deferred to a future release) ranks candidates by buffer percentage first, then APY — see the option ladder methodology for why buffer matters more than yield in this strategy.
FCEL (FCEL) — which option strategy fits your view?
If you're bullish long-term but cautious near-term on FCEL (FCEL), SELL PUT into your floor zone collects premium while waiting for a better entry. If you already own it and are neutral-to-mildly-bullish, COVERED CALL caps upside but harvests time decay. The wrong strategy on the right ticker still loses money — match the trade to your view, not the other way around.
FCEL (FCEL) — is now a good entry?
Entry timing on FCEL (FCEL) is a function of your floor price (hard buy zone) and golden price (back-the-truck-up zone). Both are personal — set them in your watchlist and we'll alert you when the market hits either level.
FAQ
Why does FCEL show different P/E numbers on different sites?
Different data providers use different earnings windows (TTM vs forward, GAAP vs adjusted) and update at different cadences. We surface trailing P/E with a 5-year percentile rank to give context — a P/E of 30 is hot for one stock and cold for another.
Does this page show FCEL's implied volatility?
Not on this v0 page — the dedicated volatility tool covers IV with multi-source voting (IBKR + Polygon + yfinance). For pure IV lookup, use /tools/volatility. This page is for decision-stage queries that pull together valuation + portfolio context.
How is this different from Yahoo Finance or 雪球's FCEL page?
Those sites are great for raw data discovery — last price, news, headline P/E. This page is built for the second look: you've already seen a single-dimension signal somewhere else, now you need multi-dimensional decision context (your floor, the valuation percentile, your portfolio overlay) in one view, not five tabs.