GTLB (GTLB)
GTLB is rated NEUTRAL as its valuation is deemed fair but supported only by a single data source, while extremely high implied volatility and low floor confidence add uncertainty.
- Valuation is fair with a PE at the 60.9th percentile and a PB at the 32.7th percentile, but the single_source validation flag means the assessment rests on limited data.
- Implied volatility rank is 96.4%, labeled high, suggesting elevated options pricing risk with only 221 days of history.
- No valid floor exists (zero valid floors) and the suitability verdict is unsuitable, undermining a margin-of-safety approach.
BUY-ZONE DECISION rule signal
Sign in
RULES & ALERTS FIRING
Sign in
VALUATION
Floor Engine
YOUR WATCHLIST CONTEXT
○ anonymous· Your personal floor / golden price overlay on the live price
· Per-ticker rule alerts when this stock crosses your thresholds
· Position P&L overlay — what this ticker means inside your full portfolio
IMPLIED VOLATILITY
Earnings Reactions
| Date | Time | EPS | Surprise | Gap% | Day% | Week% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-03 | AMC | 0.30 | +30.0% | -11.61% | -6.18% | -13.26% |
| 2025-12-02 | AMC | 0.25 | +24.0% | -10.56% | -12.77% | -6.62% |
| 2025-09-03 | AMC | 0.24 | +46.5% | -7.17% | -7.35% | +6.03% |
| 2025-06-10 | AMC | 0.17 | +12.1% | -13.46% | -10.60% | -13.34% |
| 2025-03-03 | AMC | 0.33 | +44.6% | -3.30% | +11.64% | -7.66% |
| 2024-12-05 | AMC | 0.23 | +44.4% | +11.30% | +1.74% | -11.27% |
| 2024-09-03 | AMC | 0.15 | +45.8% | +12.87% | +21.64% | +23.75% |
| 2024-06-03 | AMC | 0.03 | +179.2% | -0.36% | -4.93% | -7.39% |
Is GTLB (GTLB) overvalued right now?
GTLB (GTLB) is currently trading at a trailing P/E of 468.5, sitting at the 61th percentile of its 5-year valuation history. A high percentile suggests the market is pricing the stock above its own historical norm — useful context before sizing a new position or selling premium against it.
GTLB (GTLB) — what's the SELL PUT risk profile?
Selling cash-secured puts on GTLB (GTLB) is a common income strategy, but the right strike depends on your floor price (the level you'd happily own at) and the option chain's buffer/APY tradeoff. The full ladder view (deferred to a future release) ranks candidates by buffer percentage first, then APY — see the option ladder methodology for why buffer matters more than yield in this strategy.
GTLB (GTLB) — which option strategy fits your view?
If you're bullish long-term but cautious near-term on GTLB (GTLB), SELL PUT into your floor zone collects premium while waiting for a better entry. If you already own it and are neutral-to-mildly-bullish, COVERED CALL caps upside but harvests time decay. The wrong strategy on the right ticker still loses money — match the trade to your view, not the other way around.
GTLB (GTLB) — is now a good entry?
Entry timing on GTLB (GTLB) is a function of your floor price (hard buy zone) and golden price (back-the-truck-up zone). Both are personal — set them in your watchlist and we'll alert you when the market hits either level.
FAQ
Why does GTLB show different P/E numbers on different sites?
Different data providers use different earnings windows (TTM vs forward, GAAP vs adjusted) and update at different cadences. We surface trailing P/E with a 5-year percentile rank to give context — a P/E of 30 is hot for one stock and cold for another.
Does this page show GTLB's implied volatility?
Not on this v0 page — the dedicated volatility tool covers IV with multi-source voting (IBKR + Polygon + yfinance). For pure IV lookup, use /tools/volatility. This page is for decision-stage queries that pull together valuation + portfolio context.
How is this different from Yahoo Finance or 雪球's GTLB page?
Those sites are great for raw data discovery — last price, news, headline P/E. This page is built for the second look: you've already seen a single-dimension signal somewhere else, now you need multi-dimensional decision context (your floor, the valuation percentile, your portfolio overlay) in one view, not five tabs.