LMND (LMND)
LMND is rated NEUTRAL because valuation data is absent and the sole floor-based route yields low confidence, leaving no strong directional signal.
- No valuation method is available — PE, PB, PS, and earnings yield spread are all missing, so there is no fundamental anchor to assess overpricing or underpricing.
- The floor analysis shows a low-confidence verdict of "route alternative" with 0 valid primary floors (dividend, valuation, EPV all null), meaning reliable downside support cannot be established.
- Implied volatility is elevated at 56.42% but ranks very low historically (4.5th percentile), indicating options are cheap relative to the past year, yet this alone does not justify a bullish or bearish stance.
BUY-ZONE DECISION rule signal
Sign in
RULES & ALERTS FIRING
Sign in
VALUATION
Floor Engine
YOUR WATCHLIST CONTEXT
○ anonymous· Your personal floor / golden price overlay on the live price
· Per-ticker rule alerts when this stock crosses your thresholds
· Position P&L overlay — what this ticker means inside your full portfolio
IMPLIED VOLATILITY
Earnings Reactions
| Date | Time | EPS | Surprise | Gap% | Day% | Week% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-29 | BMO | -0.49 | +13.8% | +0.09% | -14.85% | -19.42% |
| 2026-02-19 | BMO | -0.29 | +32.6% | +12.58% | -6.18% | -16.07% |
| 2025-11-05 | BMO | -0.51 | +27.6% | +15.41% | +34.21% | +31.26% |
| 2025-08-05 | BMO | -0.76 | +0.2% | +11.84% | +29.54% | +47.54% |
| 2025-05-06 | BMO | -0.76 | +9.2% | +8.53% | +1.03% | +8.67% |
| 2025-02-25 | AMC | -0.42 | +25.3% | -15.24% | -1.59% | +15.13% |
| 2024-10-30 | AMC | -0.95 | +6.9% | +11.36% | +26.77% | +45.76% |
| 2024-07-30 | AMC | -0.81 | +7.2% | -10.74% | -20.33% | -32.21% |
Is LMND (LMND) overvalued right now?
Whether LMND (LMND) is overvalued depends on the lens you use: trailing P/E vs its own history, CAPE vs the broader market, earnings yield vs Treasury yields. We surface all three so you don't have to pick one in isolation.
LMND (LMND) — what's the SELL PUT risk profile?
Selling cash-secured puts on LMND (LMND) is a common income strategy, but the right strike depends on your floor price (the level you'd happily own at) and the option chain's buffer/APY tradeoff. The full ladder view (deferred to a future release) ranks candidates by buffer percentage first, then APY — see the option ladder methodology for why buffer matters more than yield in this strategy.
LMND (LMND) — which option strategy fits your view?
If you're bullish long-term but cautious near-term on LMND (LMND), SELL PUT into your floor zone collects premium while waiting for a better entry. If you already own it and are neutral-to-mildly-bullish, COVERED CALL caps upside but harvests time decay. The wrong strategy on the right ticker still loses money — match the trade to your view, not the other way around.
LMND (LMND) — is now a good entry?
Entry timing on LMND (LMND) is a function of your floor price (hard buy zone) and golden price (back-the-truck-up zone). Both are personal — set them in your watchlist and we'll alert you when the market hits either level.
FAQ
Why does LMND show different P/E numbers on different sites?
Different data providers use different earnings windows (TTM vs forward, GAAP vs adjusted) and update at different cadences. We surface trailing P/E with a 5-year percentile rank to give context — a P/E of 30 is hot for one stock and cold for another.
Does this page show LMND's implied volatility?
Not on this v0 page — the dedicated volatility tool covers IV with multi-source voting (IBKR + Polygon + yfinance). For pure IV lookup, use /tools/volatility. This page is for decision-stage queries that pull together valuation + portfolio context.
How is this different from Yahoo Finance or 雪球's LMND page?
Those sites are great for raw data discovery — last price, news, headline P/E. This page is built for the second look: you've already seen a single-dimension signal somewhere else, now you need multi-dimensional decision context (your floor, the valuation percentile, your portfolio overlay) in one view, not five tabs.