MT (MT)
MT holds a NEUTRAL verdict due to insufficient valuation data and a marginal floor suitability despite high implied volatility.
- Valuation data is unavailable — PE history covers only 9 months (need 60), and no method, current multiples, or verdict can be determined.
- The floor confidence is low with zero valid primary floors, and the suitability verdict is marginal; warnings cite insufficient PE history.
- Implied volatility rank is a high 78.5%, but with no buyzone data, risk alerts, or extreme-low flag, there is no strong directional signal.
BUY-ZONE DECISION rule signal
Sign in
RULES & ALERTS FIRING
Sign in
VALUATION
Floor Engine
method skipped: insufficient PE history (9 months, need 60)
YOUR WATCHLIST CONTEXT
○ anonymous· Your personal floor / golden price overlay on the live price
· Per-ticker rule alerts when this stock crosses your thresholds
· Position P&L overlay — what this ticker means inside your full portfolio
IMPLIED VOLATILITY
Earnings Reactions
| Date | Time | EPS | Surprise | Gap% | Day% | Week% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | BMO | 0.75 | +6.1% | +3.88% | +2.31% | +9.33% |
| 2026-02-05 | BMO | 0.86 | +56.9% | +0.59% | +2.25% | +10.02% |
| 2025-11-06 | BMO | 0.49 | -14.8% | +3.39% | +1.18% | +6.63% |
| 2025-07-31 | BMO | 1.32 | -27.2% | -6.69% | -2.56% | -0.31% |
| 2025-04-30 | BMO | 1.04 | +42.7% | -6.09% | -1.66% | -0.96% |
| 2025-02-06 | BMO | 0.52 | -29.1% | +7.54% | +11.19% | +12.68% |
| 2024-11-07 | BMO | 0.63 | +30.5% | +4.37% | +4.29% | -3.66% |
| 2024-08-01 | BMO | 0.63 | -21.8% | -1.92% | -6.30% | -4.55% |
Is MT (MT) overvalued right now?
Whether MT (MT) is overvalued depends on the lens you use: trailing P/E vs its own history, CAPE vs the broader market, earnings yield vs Treasury yields. We surface all three so you don't have to pick one in isolation.
MT (MT) — what's the SELL PUT risk profile?
Selling cash-secured puts on MT (MT) is a common income strategy, but the right strike depends on your floor price (the level you'd happily own at) and the option chain's buffer/APY tradeoff. The full ladder view (deferred to a future release) ranks candidates by buffer percentage first, then APY — see the option ladder methodology for why buffer matters more than yield in this strategy.
MT (MT) — which option strategy fits your view?
If you're bullish long-term but cautious near-term on MT (MT), SELL PUT into your floor zone collects premium while waiting for a better entry. If you already own it and are neutral-to-mildly-bullish, COVERED CALL caps upside but harvests time decay. The wrong strategy on the right ticker still loses money — match the trade to your view, not the other way around.
MT (MT) — is now a good entry?
Entry timing on MT (MT) is a function of your floor price (hard buy zone) and golden price (back-the-truck-up zone). Both are personal — set them in your watchlist and we'll alert you when the market hits either level.
FAQ
Why does MT show different P/E numbers on different sites?
Different data providers use different earnings windows (TTM vs forward, GAAP vs adjusted) and update at different cadences. We surface trailing P/E with a 5-year percentile rank to give context — a P/E of 30 is hot for one stock and cold for another.
Does this page show MT's implied volatility?
Not on this v0 page — the dedicated volatility tool covers IV with multi-source voting (IBKR + Polygon + yfinance). For pure IV lookup, use /tools/volatility. This page is for decision-stage queries that pull together valuation + portfolio context.
How is this different from Yahoo Finance or 雪球's MT page?
Those sites are great for raw data discovery — last price, news, headline P/E. This page is built for the second look: you've already seen a single-dimension signal somewhere else, now you need multi-dimensional decision context (your floor, the valuation percentile, your portfolio overlay) in one view, not five tabs.