QBTS (QBTS)
QBTS carries a NEUTRAL verdict as it lacks fundamental valuation anchors and trades at elevated implied volatility without a clear downside floor.
- The stock has no conventional valuation data (no PE, PB, or PS metrics), making it impossible to assess whether it is cheap or expensive on a fundamental basis.
- Current implied volatility (136.6%) is in the 90.4th percentile over the past year, signaling heightened option premiums that cut both ways — no bullish or bearish edge.
- A low-confidence floor assessment deems the stock unsuitable for floor-based strategies, and zero valid floors leave no objective price anchor to gauge risk. No red alerts are active, but the lack of data keeps the view neutral.
BUY-ZONE DECISION rule signal
Sign in
RULES & ALERTS FIRING
Sign in
VALUATION
Floor Engine
YOUR WATCHLIST CONTEXT
○ anonymous· Your personal floor / golden price overlay on the live price
· Per-ticker rule alerts when this stock crosses your thresholds
· Position P&L overlay — what this ticker means inside your full portfolio
IMPLIED VOLATILITY
Earnings Reactions
| Date | Time | EPS | Surprise | Gap% | Day% | Week% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | BMO | -0.04 | +46.0% | -6.70% | -6.99% | -24.30% |
| 2026-02-26 | BMO | -0.09 | -45.9% | +5.19% | +2.49% | -4.17% |
| 2025-11-06 | BMO | -0.05 | +24.5% | -1.69% | -8.48% | -24.60% |
| 2025-08-07 | BMO | -0.08 | -47.4% | -3.30% | -2.33% | +3.41% |
| 2025-05-08 | BMO | -0.03 | +16.9% | +25.83% | +51.23% | +60.09% |
| 2025-03-13 | BMO | -0.08 | -25.0% | +4.12% | +18.73% | +49.31% |
| 2024-11-14 | BMO | -0.10 | -26.3% | -1.12% | +5.06% | +10.67% |
| 2024-08-08 | BMO | -0.11 | -45.0% | -3.70% | -1.23% | +15.93% |
Is QBTS (QBTS) overvalued right now?
Whether QBTS (QBTS) is overvalued depends on the lens you use: trailing P/E vs its own history, CAPE vs the broader market, earnings yield vs Treasury yields. We surface all three so you don't have to pick one in isolation.
QBTS (QBTS) — what's the SELL PUT risk profile?
Selling cash-secured puts on QBTS (QBTS) is a common income strategy, but the right strike depends on your floor price (the level you'd happily own at) and the option chain's buffer/APY tradeoff. The full ladder view (deferred to a future release) ranks candidates by buffer percentage first, then APY — see the option ladder methodology for why buffer matters more than yield in this strategy.
QBTS (QBTS) — which option strategy fits your view?
If you're bullish long-term but cautious near-term on QBTS (QBTS), SELL PUT into your floor zone collects premium while waiting for a better entry. If you already own it and are neutral-to-mildly-bullish, COVERED CALL caps upside but harvests time decay. The wrong strategy on the right ticker still loses money — match the trade to your view, not the other way around.
QBTS (QBTS) — is now a good entry?
Entry timing on QBTS (QBTS) is a function of your floor price (hard buy zone) and golden price (back-the-truck-up zone). Both are personal — set them in your watchlist and we'll alert you when the market hits either level.
FAQ
Why does QBTS show different P/E numbers on different sites?
Different data providers use different earnings windows (TTM vs forward, GAAP vs adjusted) and update at different cadences. We surface trailing P/E with a 5-year percentile rank to give context — a P/E of 30 is hot for one stock and cold for another.
Does this page show QBTS's implied volatility?
Not on this v0 page — the dedicated volatility tool covers IV with multi-source voting (IBKR + Polygon + yfinance). For pure IV lookup, use /tools/volatility. This page is for decision-stage queries that pull together valuation + portfolio context.
How is this different from Yahoo Finance or 雪球's QBTS page?
Those sites are great for raw data discovery — last price, news, headline P/E. This page is built for the second look: you've already seen a single-dimension signal somewhere else, now you need multi-dimensional decision context (your floor, the valuation percentile, your portfolio overlay) in one view, not five tabs.