SATS (SATS)
SATS earns a NEUTRAL bucket because valuation data is absent and the stock's floor lacks a hard method, yet volatility is low and no risk alerts are triggered.
- Valuation is missing: current PE, PB, PS, and earnings yield spread are all null, providing no fundamental anchor.
- Floor models are unsuitable: no primary floor (dividend/valuation/EPV) could be calculated, and the confidence is low with a warning that hard-logic floor methods do not apply.
- Volatility is low (IV rank 21.7% labeled 'low'), and there are zero risk alerts, so downside concerns are minimal despite the lack of valuation support.
BUY-ZONE DECISION rule signal
Sign in
RULES & ALERTS FIRING
Sign in
VALUATION
Floor Engine
YOUR WATCHLIST CONTEXT
○ anonymous· Your personal floor / golden price overlay on the live price
· Per-ticker rule alerts when this stock crosses your thresholds
· Position P&L overlay — what this ticker means inside your full portfolio
IMPLIED VOLATILITY
Earnings Reactions
| Date | Time | EPS | Surprise | Gap% | Day% | Week% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | BMO | -0.71 | +42.1% | +0.57% | +1.57% | +7.31% |
| 2026-03-02 | BMO | -0.37 | +42.6% | +1.41% | +2.73% | -4.86% |
| 2025-11-06 | BMO | -1.19 | +2.0% | +0.11% | -2.31% | -3.24% |
| 2025-08-01 | BMO | -1.06 | -1.8% | -9.63% | -17.37% | -16.91% |
| 2025-05-09 | BMO | -0.71 | +18.0% | +0.84% | +1.43% | -1.93% |
| 2025-02-27 | BMO | 1.23 | — | +1.10% | +4.83% | -2.17% |
| 2024-11-12 | BMO | -0.52 | -70.6% | -2.22% | -12.90% | -7.27% |
| 2024-08-09 | BMO | -0.76 | -884.0% | -7.22% | -16.53% | -10.61% |
Is SATS (SATS) overvalued right now?
Whether SATS (SATS) is overvalued depends on the lens you use: trailing P/E vs its own history, CAPE vs the broader market, earnings yield vs Treasury yields. We surface all three so you don't have to pick one in isolation.
SATS (SATS) — what's the SELL PUT risk profile?
Selling cash-secured puts on SATS (SATS) is a common income strategy, but the right strike depends on your floor price (the level you'd happily own at) and the option chain's buffer/APY tradeoff. The full ladder view (deferred to a future release) ranks candidates by buffer percentage first, then APY — see the option ladder methodology for why buffer matters more than yield in this strategy.
SATS (SATS) — which option strategy fits your view?
If you're bullish long-term but cautious near-term on SATS (SATS), SELL PUT into your floor zone collects premium while waiting for a better entry. If you already own it and are neutral-to-mildly-bullish, COVERED CALL caps upside but harvests time decay. The wrong strategy on the right ticker still loses money — match the trade to your view, not the other way around.
SATS (SATS) — is now a good entry?
Entry timing on SATS (SATS) is a function of your floor price (hard buy zone) and golden price (back-the-truck-up zone). Both are personal — set them in your watchlist and we'll alert you when the market hits either level.
FAQ
Why does SATS show different P/E numbers on different sites?
Different data providers use different earnings windows (TTM vs forward, GAAP vs adjusted) and update at different cadences. We surface trailing P/E with a 5-year percentile rank to give context — a P/E of 30 is hot for one stock and cold for another.
Does this page show SATS's implied volatility?
Not on this v0 page — the dedicated volatility tool covers IV with multi-source voting (IBKR + Polygon + yfinance). For pure IV lookup, use /tools/volatility. This page is for decision-stage queries that pull together valuation + portfolio context.
How is this different from Yahoo Finance or 雪球's SATS page?
Those sites are great for raw data discovery — last price, news, headline P/E. This page is built for the second look: you've already seen a single-dimension signal somewhere else, now you need multi-dimensional decision context (your floor, the valuation percentile, your portfolio overlay) in one view, not five tabs.