WING (WING)
WING has no clear signal.
- Buy-zone state: far (+1013.4% to floor)
BUY-ZONE DECISION rule signal
WING is far above the floor (~1013.4% above) — adding here means paying a premium vs. your own threshold. Wait or take partial position only with a strong directional view.
RULES & ALERTS FIRING
Sign in
VALUATION
Floor Engine
method skipped: yield distribution structurally broken (early 3y median 7.82% → recent 3y median 0.35%, ratio 0.04). Likely re-rating; historical yield p90 not a meaningful floor.
method skipped: stock is already pricing CHEAPER than its 5-year extreme — current PE 21.2× vs historical 5th-pct 35.7×. The PE-percentile formula gives 35.7× × EPS = 191.34, which is ABOVE the current price 113.58, making it a mean-reversion target (where the stock could rally TO), not a downside floor (where buyers would step in).
YOUR WATCHLIST CONTEXT
○ anonymous· Your personal floor / golden price overlay on the live price
· Per-ticker rule alerts when this stock crosses your thresholds
· Position P&L overlay — what this ticker means inside your full portfolio
IMPLIED VOLATILITY
Earnings Reactions
| Date | Time | EPS | Surprise | Gap% | Day% | Week% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-29 | BMO | 1.18 | +15.4% | +2.00% | +3.40% | -8.16% |
| 2026-04-29 | BMO | 1.18 | +15.1% | -9.15% | -1.02% | -15.92% |
| 2026-02-18 | BMO | 1.00 | +20.0% | +11.61% | +10.84% | +0.96% |
| 2025-11-04 | BMO | 1.09 | +19.0% | +2.77% | +10.86% | +11.70% |
| 2025-07-30 | BMO | 1.00 | +15.0% | +27.80% | +26.86% | +15.73% |
| 2025-04-30 | BMO | 1.03 | +18.5% | -1.66% | +14.48% | +17.20% |
| 2025-02-19 | BMO | 0.95 | +9.6% | -10.97% | -13.40% | -25.56% |
| 2024-10-30 | BMO | 0.89 | -6.6% | -14.55% | -21.40% | -14.48% |
Is WING (WING) overvalued right now?
Whether WING (WING) is overvalued depends on the lens you use: trailing P/E vs its own history, CAPE vs the broader market, earnings yield vs Treasury yields. We surface all three so you don't have to pick one in isolation.
WING (WING) — what's the SELL PUT risk profile?
Selling cash-secured puts on WING (WING) is a common income strategy, but the right strike depends on your floor price (the level you'd happily own at) and the option chain's buffer/APY tradeoff. The full ladder view (deferred to a future release) ranks candidates by buffer percentage first, then APY — see the option ladder methodology for why buffer matters more than yield in this strategy.
WING (WING) — which option strategy fits your view?
If you're bullish long-term but cautious near-term on WING (WING), SELL PUT into your floor zone collects premium while waiting for a better entry. If you already own it and are neutral-to-mildly-bullish, COVERED CALL caps upside but harvests time decay. The wrong strategy on the right ticker still loses money — match the trade to your view, not the other way around.
WING (WING) — is now a good entry?
Entry timing on WING (WING) is a function of your floor price (hard buy zone) and golden price (back-the-truck-up zone). Both are personal — set them in your watchlist and we'll alert you when the market hits either level.
FAQ
Why does WING show different P/E numbers on different sites?
Different data providers use different earnings windows (TTM vs forward, GAAP vs adjusted) and update at different cadences. We surface trailing P/E with a 5-year percentile rank to give context — a P/E of 30 is hot for one stock and cold for another.
Does this page show WING's implied volatility?
Not on this v0 page — the dedicated volatility tool covers IV with multi-source voting (IBKR + Polygon + yfinance). For pure IV lookup, use /tools/volatility. This page is for decision-stage queries that pull together valuation + portfolio context.
How is this different from Yahoo Finance or 雪球's WING page?
Those sites are great for raw data discovery — last price, news, headline P/E. This page is built for the second look: you've already seen a single-dimension signal somewhere else, now you need multi-dimensional decision context (your floor, the valuation percentile, your portfolio overlay) in one view, not five tabs.